This website is the syllabus.
Learning outcomes: To acquire a detailed knowledge of the black letter law of contracts and the ability to use that knowledge in problem-solving analytical reasoning.
Important notices. Please read.
August 19
Reading: Dougherty v. Salt
Tutorial: Consideration 1
Case tutorial: Dougherty v. Salt
| PowerPoint: Consideration Basics | Additional class hypotheticals |
| Download consideration flow chart |
August 21
Reading: Schnell v. Nell
Case tutorial: Schnell v. Nell
Tutorial: Consideration 2
Reading: Linder v. Mid-Continent
| PowerPoint: Nominal Consideration |
August 22
Reading: Wickham v. Farmers' Lumber
Case tutorial: Wickham v. Farmers' Lumber
August 26
Tutorial: Consideration 3
Reading: Wood v. Lucy Lady Duff-Gordon
Case tutorial: Wood v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon
| PowerPoint: Illusory Promises | Hypotheticals |
Reading: Laclede Gas Co. v. Amoco
Case tutorial: Laclede Gas Co. v. Amoco
| PowerPoint: UCC 2-306 and Laclede |
August 28
Tutorial: Consideration 4
Reading: De Cicco v. Schweizer
Case tutorial: De Cicco v. Schweizer
Reading: Lingenfelder v. Wainwright
Case tutorial: Lingenfelder v. Wainwright
| PowerPoint: Preexisting duty rule |
August 29
Reading: Angel v. Murray
Case tutorial: Angel v. Murray
| PowerPoint: Angel v. Murray |
tutorial: Consideration 6
Reading: Central London Property Trust v. High Trees House
Case tutorial: Central London Property Trust v. High Trees House
| PowerPoint: Promissory Estoppel |
September 2
Labor Day, no class
The material under September 2 is completely optional. This just a convenient place to put it.
Tutorial: Consideration 5
Reading: Springstead v. Nees
Case tutorial: Springstead v. Nees
Reading: Mullen v. Hawkins
| Flowchart: Giving up a claim |
| Flowchart: Debt settlement |
| PowerPoint: Debts and claims |
Tutorials: Consideration 7
Reading: Webb v. McGowin
| PowerPoint: Moral obligaton as consideration |
Reading: Hammer v. Sidway
| Benefit Detriment PowerPoint |
September 4
| Consideration Review |
Reading: Embry v. Hargardine-McKittrick
Case tutorial: Embry v. Hargardine-McKittrick
tutorials: Interpretation 1, Interpretation 2
| Download interpretation flow chart |
| Objective Intent Test PowerPoint | Power to the People Hypothetical |
September 5
| PowerPoint: Ambiguity |
Tutorials: Interpretation 3,
Reading: Spaulding v. Morse
Case tutorial: Spaulding v. Morse
| Hypothetical Intent Test PowerPoint |
September 9
Tutorials: Interpretation 4, Interpretation 5
Reading: Berwick and Smith v. Salem
| PowerPoint: Trade usage and Restatement 201 |
| PowerPoint: Review questions--consideration and intepretation |
Tutorials: Offer and Acceptance 1
Reading: Lefkowitz v. Minne. Surplus Store
| Traditional offer and acceptance PowerPoint |
September 11
tutorial: Offer and Acceptance 3
Reading: Davis v. Jacoby, Klockner v. Green
| Manner of Acceptance |
September 12
Mostly via the tutorials
tutorial: Offer and Acceptance 4
Reading: Petterson v. Pattberg
tutorial: Offer and Acceptance 5
Reading: Drennan v. Star Paving Co.
| Revokabiity and irrevocability PowerPoint |
September 16
tutorial: Offer and Acceptance 6
Reading: Lewis v. Browning
| Mailbox rule PowerPoint |
September 18
NO CLASS
September 19
Reading: Ardente v. Horan
| Mirror image rule PowerPoint |
Tutorial: Offer and Acceptance 7
September 23
Reading: Poel v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender
| Poel v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender |
Reading:UCC 2-207
Tutorial: UCC 2-207
| UCC 2-207 PowerPoint |
| Sowle and Santana hypothetical |
Tutorial: Offer and Acceptance 8
| Silence as Acceptance PowerPoint |
September 25
Reading: Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores
tutorial: Offer and Acceptance 9
| Promissory estoppel as a cause of action PowerPoint |
| Review: 4 PowerPoint |
| Review: the 2014 exam |
September 26
Tutorial: Remedies 1
Reading: Hawkins v. McGee
Case tutorial: Hawkins v. McGee
| PowerPoint: The expectation measure of damages |
| Sample exam question |
September 30
Reading:Rockingham Cty. v. Luten Bridge
Case tutorial: Rockingham Cty. v. Luten Bridge
Tutorials: Remedies 2
| Mitigation PowerPoint |
| Longer hypothetical |
| Sowlefully yours |
Hawkins, Tony, Luten Bridge PowerPoint
October 2
Tutorials: Remedies 3
Remedies 4Reading: Hadley v. Baxendale
Case tutorial: Hadley v. Baxendale
| Doctrinal Foreseeability PowerPoint |
October 3
No Class
October 7
| Foreseeability: Information and control |
| Foreseeability information and control PowerPoint |
Reading: EVRA v. Swiss Bank
Case tutorial: EVRA v. Swiss Bank
| EVRA PowerPoint |
October 9
Reading: Rambola v. Cosindas
Tutorial: Remedies 5
| Proof requirement PowerPoint |
| Longer hypotheticals |
| Ed and Sally |
| Rimbaud |
Tutorials: Seller Breach I
| UCC buyer's damages: examples |
UCC sections: 2-712, 2-713, 2-714
October 10 Reading: Neri v. Retail Marine Tutorials: Buyer Breach I,
Buyer Breach II OCtober 14 Reading: Security Stove v. American Railway Express Case tutorial: Security Stove v. American Railway Express Tutorial: Remedies 7 Tutorial: Remedies 8 Reading:Truck Rent-A-Center v. Puritan Farms October 16 Tutorial: Remedies 12 Reading: Laclede v. Amoco Reading: Peevyhouse v. Garland Goal tutorials: Remedies 9,
Remedies 10,
Remedies 11 October 21 Reading: Osteen v. Johnson Case tutorial: Osteen v. Johnson tutorials: Remedies 13,
Remedies 14,
Remedies 15 Material Breach Tutorial: Remedies 16 Reading: K & G Construction v. Harris
October 22 Reading: Walker & Co. v. Harrison Tutorial: Remedies 17,
UCC: Buyer Breach, Seller Damages
UCC sections: 2-706, 2-708
UCC seller's damages: examples
Reliance Damages
Liquidated Damages
PowerPoint: Liquidated damages
Extended hypothetical
Specific performance
Specific performance PowerPoint
Laclede v. Amoco PowerPoint
Cost of Completion Measure
Peevyhouse v. Garland Coal PowerPoint
Ways of measuring value
Restitution
Restitution PowerPoint
K and G construction PowerPoint
Review Questions PowerPoint
Cure
Walker and Co. v. Harrison PowerPoint
Rescission PowerPoint
Excuse of Performance
Excuse 1
Cure PowerPoint
Reading: UCC 2-508, UCC 2-601, UCC 2-612
A 2-508 example: 2015 exam and answer key
| 2015 exam | 2015 exam answer key |
October 24
Reading: Hochster v. De La Tour
| Hochster v. De La Tour PowerPoint |
Tutorial: Excuse 2
Reading: Hathaway v. Sabin
Reading: UCC 2-609
| Sowle Brill virus hypothetical |
| Sowle Brill snowstorm hypothetical |
October 28
| Hathaway v. Sabin and UCC 2-609 PowerPoint |
Reading: Taylor v. Caldwell
Reading: Transatlantic Financing v. U. S.
| Taylor v. Caldwell PowerPoint |
October 30
Reading: Krell v. Henry
| Impracticability and frustration PowerPoint |
| Impracticability and Frustration: Information and Control |
Reading: Griffith v. Brymer
| Mutual Mistake, Griffith v. Brymer |
October 31
Reading: Sherwood v. Walker, Wood v. Boynton
| Sherwood v. Walker, Wood v. Boynton PowerPoint |
November 4
tutorial: Excuse 8
Reading: Elsinore Union School District v. Kastoroff
| Unilateral mistake PowerPoint |
Tutorial: Excuse 9, Duress
Tutorial: Excuse 10, Unconscionability
Reading: Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors
| Unconscionability PowerPoint |
| Unconscionability hypos |
November 6
Reading: Notes on the Statute of Frauds
| Review: 4 PowerPoint |
Reading: Mitchill v. Lath, UCC 2-202
tutorial: Parol Evidence 1
| Basic Parol Evidence Rule PowerPoint |
| Review |
November 11
| Complete integration and scope PowerPoint |
| Sowle shoes |
| Cirque du Sowle review |
Tutorials: Parol Evidence 2, Parol Evidence 3
Reading: Lee v. Seagram & Sons
tutorial: Parol Evidence 4
| Review |
| 2014 exam (the essay questions at the end |
November 13
| Using parol evidence to interpret written agreements: PowerPoint |
tutorial: Parol Evidence 6
Reading: Dannan Realty v. Harris
tutorial: Parol Evidence 5
| Dannan Realty v. Harris PowerPoint |
| 2011 exam for review |
| 2011 answer key |
November 14
No class
November 18
Practice exam review
| Exam | Answer Key | |
| 2018 | Exam | Answer key |
| 2017 | Exam | Answer key |
| 2016 | Exam | Answer key |
| 2015 |
| 2020 Exam |
| Answer key |
| 2021 exam |
| Answer key |
| 2022 |
| 2022 Answer key |
| 2023 |
| 2023 Answer key |
| PowerPoint: 2023 Review |